WE LEAVE NO ONE BEHIND

I am not a person who defines his life by his military service.   After twenty-two years in the military I moved on – a new life – a new career.   However, it burns my ass to hear non-combatants talking about the value in a prisoner exchange.    Chris Matthews on MSNBC setting himself up as authorities on one soldier’s value against the value of POW’s we hold, released in exchange, has me infuriated.  

Ask any combat veteran: YOU LEAVE NO ONE BEHIND!  

I spent eight years in SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape.)    

Among other missions we taught high priority military persons (SEALS, Special Forces, Combat Aviators) how to survive and behave as a prisoner of war.    One thing we always stressed is: You will never be left behind – you will never be forgotten or abandoned by your country.

As an authority I can tell you that every person has his or her breaking point.   During both the Korean and Vietnam wars POW s were forced by their captors to make public statements against the war effort and against their country.  These men were not traders – they were POW s under duress: day after day; week after week; month after month; year after year they were subjected to 24 hours a day of interrogations, propaganda and mistreatment.   Those few that went over the line and collaborated against their fellow POW s were brought home to stand before military justice; but they were brought home.   

YOU LEAVE NO ONE BEHIND. 

We do not know the mental state of this young soldier when he left is unit.   We do know he was an active duty military man serving in a war zone - and as such a brother in arms – captured by the enemy.  

One premise that has always kept our American military captives held in enemy hands loyal and resisting is the fact that they will not be forgotten – they will not be left behind by our country – they will be brought home.   Now, civilians seem to want to inject a quid quo pro value on prisoners of war to determine their worth in some sort of capitalism of exchange.

There is not one combat active duty or combat veteran (including myself) that would not willingly, today, go into harms way to free a POW – no questions asked. 

As our war in Afghanistan winds down we need to face the realization that international law requires the release of all prisoners.   We have already violated this precept by continuing to detain POW s from the Iraq war: and yes, the prisoners in Gitmo are POW s – suspected enemy combatants taken prisoner during war time, and detained in a military prison camp.   The United States does not have the right to detain POW s beyond the end of a declared war because of actions they may or may not perform in the future.

And regardless what some civilian, self proclaimed arm chair authority on the value of a U.S. military man may expound: we band of brothers, we combat veterans say:

 FUCK YOU – WE LEAVE NO ONE BEHIND!

the Ol’Buzzard

A BUZZARD EGG OMELET #22

Did you ever wonder why anyone would ever become a proctologist?    Why would anyone ever want to spend four years as an undergraduate and six years in medical school to become an asshole doctor?

‘Little Jimmy, what do you want to be when you grow up?’  

‘I either want to drive a kakka-pumper truck and pump out septic tanks or be a proctologist.’ 

‘Little Jimmy, why would you want to do that?’

‘Because I like playing in other people’s shit and smelling farts.’ 

Seriously, do you plan for that career field or end up in that field?     When you are almost finished with med school do they tell you “you are not smart enough to be a brain surgeon or dexterous enough to be a heart sergeant but you could qualify for proctology”.  

And what’s below proctology?

‘Your grades are really bad and our motto is Do No Harm.   We can’t trust you with a scalpel, but you will probably be all right with toe nail clippers; so we will graduate you as a podiatrist.

I may be way off base on this, and probably am.   And of all people: after having re-enlisting in the military for twenty-two years, where I was paid $65.00 extra per month for combat pay while in Vietnam, I shouldn’t discredit anyone’s choice of career.   Obviously proctologist and podiatrist were smarter than I was when choosing a career.  

Therefore, I hereby offer my apology to all proctologist and podiatrist.  

But, I’m just asking?

Who the hell would want to grow up to be an undertaker?

Of course, they all drive Lexus. 

the Ol’Buzzard    

Strategic Vision

Bigniew Brezinski is one of the most intelligent men alive today.  He is currently publishing his new book Strategic Vision.   He appeared on Morning Joe on MSMBC on the 24^th and 25^th of January to discuss his book which details the decline of America as the preeminent power in the world.  

There is nothing I could add to this post that would enhance this discussion.   It is a must see – and possibly the final word on the state of the nation.  

the Ol’Buzzard

Brezinski's interview on the 24th.

Brezniski's interview on the 25th.

(this begins with a clip from the State of the Union, but stay tuned.)

I AM NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORIST

BUT…

I am seventy-plus years old.   I have been around the block numerous times; and though I don’t think that age necessarily equates to intelligence – I can post an impressive resume.  And, the one thing I know for sure is: I don’t blindly trust our government to act in our best interest.

Now don’t get me wrong, I am a loyal American (of American ideals) – and I have the scars to prove it.  But, I don’t trust our government (politicians.)    Our government has never been a government of the people, by the people… etc.   It has always been the government of special interest and “the bigger picture” gamesmanship.

Our government constantly packages swamp land as “Preferred Real Estate Property” and sells it to the citizenry.   They tell us it’s candy but in the bottom of the box there is often a scorpion.

The last thing I blindly bought into was the liberation of the South Vietnamese people in the Vietnam war; only to discover that our real reason for occupying South Vietnam was to tactically establish a permanent nuclear military presence on the southern border of China (sounds familiar in reverse: Cuban missile crisis.)    Then, of course, “Iraqi Freedom” where a White House full of oil men invade a country with the second largest oil reserve on earth. 

We have constantly been sold a bill of goods only to find that some patriotic spin name has been added to cover up the smell:  The Patriot Act – I need say no more.

We have moved from Bush’s “phone tapping of (only) foreign suspected terrorist”, to authorized surveillance of American citizens and to expanded surveillance authority for civilian police.  Now Obama has just signed an appropriations bill that allows the government to arrest and detain, without trial, any American citizen suspected of terrorist connections.   Obama says he will not use this authority, but what about a future fundamentalist, Tea Party, Republican President – what about a President Cheney clone?  

 Think about how this could fit in to George Orwell’s 1984 repackaged as 20XX.  

Now there is a new government threat covertly aimed at taking the first step to control and censor the Internet.

On October 26, 2011 the Bill HR-3261 was introduced by Lamar Smith (R-TX.)   The bill is touted to prevent the piracy of U.S. copyrighted material.  The bill is commonly known as SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act.)  The actual title is “To Promote Prosperity, Creativity, and Innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes."

It’s the - “and for other purposes,” - that bothers me.  At first glance the bill seems to require Internet providers to monitor customer’s traffic and block web sites suspected of copyright infringement.  

But, the bill also states that it would make unauthorized streaming of copyright material a crime with a maximum imprisonment of 5 years for ten infringements within six months.

That has me nailed; and probably everyone reading this blog who include pictures or YouTube clips on your post.  This is an open invitation to some political regime of the future to use the NSA or FBI to monitor web sites and blogs that they feel are not in the best interest of Big Brother and shut you down; or to threaten or actually imprison people that speak out.    (Does anybody still remember the First Amendment to the Constitution?)

The internet should not be the property of any government and no government should have the right to censor it “for the greater good” of its people.

the Ol’Buzzard.  

THE COST OF WAR

THE RATIONAL OF WAR IS: IF YOU CAN KILL MORE OF THEM THAN THEY CAN KILL OF YOU - THEN YOU WIN.

When I was in Vietnam my military pay was $1,600 a month; plus, I was making a fantastic $75.00 a month extra for hazardous duty combat pay.   After the war was over I read that the war had actually cost $32,000 per enemy killed.  The cost in American lives in Vietnam was:  58,178 killed, 153,452 wounded and 1,711 missing in action.  

Today I read that, not including the actual cost of the war being waged in Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States is spending $80,000,000,000 (eighty billion dollars) a year on counter terrorism efforts.   Admiral Dennis Blair (Ret.) who served as director of national intelligence for the Obama administration estimates that there are between 3,000 to 5,000 actual al-Qaeda members.   This means that we are spending between $16,000,000 and $27,000,000 (sixteen to twenty-seven million dollars) per year on each  al-Qaeda suspect.

My question is, why don’t we just contract out the wars?  We should hire mercenaries and pay them per head.  Hell, for a sixteen million dollar bounty you could count me in on the hunt. 

the Ol'Buzzard 

PREDATOR DRONES

SCIENCE NON-FICTION WARFARE

I am a science buff with eleven undergraduate hours in physics. It is not the same as being a nerd, because I don’t carry a cell phone or an i-pad, and I am not cognitive of or concerned for the latest electronic gismos.


Most of my interest in theoretical physics, however I am always intrigued by science technology developed to real world uses.


I have recently run across a book Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-first Century by P.W. Singer.   It is a fascinating book that covers Predator Drones and robotics that has been developed for the military.

Under President Obama our drone strikes have been surgically precise and deadly.   We hear occasional mention of them and most lately they were highlighted in the takedown of Kadafi.   However, there are hundreds of strikes and surveillance flights that have taken place in the Middle-East and in Africa that we never hear of.

The Predator Drones are remarkable.   The newer ones can take off and land by themselves.   They can see through clouds and even operate in total darkness; and they can remain airborne for hours or even days over selected targets.

These unmanned Predator Drones are the weapon of the future and presently the Air Force is training more drone operators than conventional pilots.

The U.S Customs service is beginning to use UAV’s (unmanned airborne vehicles) and within the next few years we can probably expect to see them as tools of civilian police departments.




Drown warfare is no longer a figment of science fiction.   The U.S. army has a number of mechanical soldiers on the drawing board and presently they are testing some versions in the field.

The DOG in a mechanical quadruped designed to help soldiers transport heavy loads across difficult terrain.

The BEAR is a somewhat humanoid track vehicle that is capable of gently lifting and carrying loads of up to 500 pounds across extremely difficult terrain.

The SWORD is a small track vehicle with telescopic eyesight that can be armed with a 50 caliber machine gun, ground-to-air rockets or anti-tank rockets.   In all test this super deadly killing machine has scored 100% in accuracy.

Even more intriguing are the micro-drones.   The old adage of “a fly on the wall” has become a reality, for a micro-drone could be programmed to fly into a room and attach itself to a wall or ceiling, and broadcast video and audio.

There is even speculation about micro-micro drones that could each be programmed for a specific reconnaissance objective and flown in a swarm, sharing information like a hive.   The possible uses of these mechanical insect clouds are limited only by the imagination.

It is not only land and air, for the Navy is developing unmanned submarines, and surface vehicles capable of protecting surface ships, tracking enemy submarines or being used for search and rescue at sea.

I find all this interesting, but also a sad comment on our nation: can you imagine what we could accomplish if our priorities were to channel federal money into technology and research for the benefit of human kind rather than for war and killing.

the Ol'Buzzard

DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL

A CULTURAL LANDMARK

As of midnight last night the law preventing gay men and women in the military from serving openly was repealed. Like the repeal of segregation this social change will take some time before all prejudice and resentment can be eradicated – and among southern, redneck, Christian fundamentalist and the Catholics Church in general the resentment and violence toward someone with a different lifestyle will never relinquish.

However, in the military it will soon be a non-starter. The military is a unique organization and conforming to regulations and orders is an accepted way of life.

Many don’t know that during the Viet Nam war there was high racial tension and there was often violence between black and white service men. It got to the point that mission readiness was affected. After the war racial tension still existed in many commands. In the Navy, the Chief of Naval Operations decreed that the any racial conflicts would be dealt with swiftly and firmly by commands and he established a training mission to bring about a better understanding between races. All active duty Navy personnel were required to attend a series of rights and responsibilities lectures and activities. There were those among the white sailors that tagged the training “Watermelon U.” I was a facilitator (instructor) for this training, which, along with the zero tolerance decreed by commanding officers of all Naval commands, brought about an end to both covert and overt displays of intolerance.

In a short time gay service in the military will be a non-issue for service personnel; however, outside the military the contention will continue – especially among military retirees continuing to live in their self-constructed past glories and among the far right Christian activist; and again, the Catholic Church.

The world moves on and many refuse to move with it.

the Ol’Buzzard

USN Ret.

HUMOR FROM THE TROOPS

MEMORIAL DAY

WAR - GOOD GOD YAALL - WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR?

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

THE SACRED SOW: THE AMERICAN MILITARY COMPLEX

UNCLE SAM WANTS YOU.

To establish my bones on this subject; I spent 22 years in the military including deployment to Viet Nam.



The men and women I served with were fantastic. The professionalism of the units I served in was beyond question; BUT, the U.S. military complex as a whole operates like a big sow, eating up a huge portion of our federal budget – growing larger and fatter than necessary. This results in the inability of our government to fund important social programs; and, it tempts our politicians to use our military injudiciously.



The military is made up of mostly young men and women from the lower socio-economic classes that go into the military for a pay check, for job training or, in some cased, to act out an adventure scenario they experienced in a Play Station video or saw on television. The reality of war and death is not a concept they truly understand.

Once in the military they are indoctrinated on valor, flag, country and corps. They are animated to become the cannon fodder that can be deployed by politicians and manipulated as expendable chess pieces by senior officers on career tracks (who, in almost all cases, are not themselves in harms way.)

I find it sad to see veterans lined up with their flags, their hats, their campaign ribbons and their military insignias in support of wars. For a great many, a military deployment in a combat zone is the high point of their life. It is their only bragging right. They have never been able to separate their membership in the “band of brothers” with the ignoble mission and carnage of war itself. They came home, married girlfriends, sired children, worked in a mill ,or some other dead end job, and on occasion line up at the bar in the VFW and drink beer and get misty eyed about their experiences. Hey, I’m not knocking them, they are my brothers.

But, my Viet Nam vet brothers seem not to realize: WE LOST THE VIET NAM WAR!   58 thousand men died – and we lost.   300 thousand wounded – and we lost.   Hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese died – and we lost.   Billions of dollars spent – and we lost.



We had no legitimate reason to be in Viet Nam – all bullshit aside, we were trying to establish a permanent military presence on the southern border of China – but we lost.

I get tense when I hear the about a young man or woman who has died in our present wars. They gave their all for our country. Bullshit! They are dead – and for no good reason. They will never have a family; they will never experience beauty; they will never have joy; they are dead. But, the politicians who declared the war are doing just fine. In an off moment, between reelection campaigns and feathering their nest, they may feel the obligation to utter some catch phrase of lip service for the dead, but it is as quickly forgotten, and their life and priorities go on.

Enough beating the antiwar drum – WAR SUX and the military should never be deployed except in a response to an imminent threat to our country. And, at such times a draft should be instituted so that all share equally in the burden and pain.



SNAFU – A word coined by military men and women.

Situation Normal All Fucked UP.


We have the image of the military as a lean mean fighting machine. In reality, the movies Catch-22 and Mash were not far afield. The military as an entity often appears to the men or women in uniform as a comedy of errors. During war time I would express it as a tragedy of errors


The idea of the military as a smooth operating, efficiently functioning autocracy is a misconception. In some cases military units are run by officers that are not screwed down tight. I served under one Commander who was obsessed with parking regulations and would threaten court-martial if the tire of your car extended a few inches beyond the gravel parking lot onto the grass. Another Commander in Vietnam refused to issue pistols to flight crews flying covert missions over the North, because his Pentecostal preacher had named him a missionary to the Vietnamese people before he deployed. A junior officer I knew pulled a pistol on his flight crew because they were not cleaning the wheel wells of his aircraft in a timely manner. Another Commander risked the lives of 23 crew members by refusing to abort from Iceland to Scotland during a blizzard and subsequently crashing his aircraft in the rough between runways. I could fill pages of mission SNAFU’s and erratic leadership from my experience of twenty-two years in the military. Yet, the junior officers and enlisted men and women on the ground always seem to be able to pull it together, protect each others ass and complete the mission.


The military is an integral part of the American experience. As mentioned earlier, our history is denoted by wars and the time periods in-between. There have been times when military service was a requirement; and, at all times (Viet Nam a possible exception) military service has been honored.

Big Brother, in George Orwell’s 1984, has a lot in common with our Republican Party. In Big Brother’s Party the word doublethink denoted the ability to accept two opposing concepts at the same time. The Republicans practice doublethink. They believe in decreasing the size of government, decreasing revenue and decreasing government spending; and, at the same time, increasing the size of the military and increasing military spending.


CONTROLLING MILITARY SPENDING

One of the biggest goals of our government should be to balance the National Budget and pay down the National Debt. If we are ever to achieve this goal we must bring our military spending under control.

President Obama’s budget proposal for 2011 is for $3.83 trillion (with a deficit forecast of $1.56 trillion, increasing our national debt from $13.8 trillion to over $15 trillion.) Approximately one third of the budget is slated for defense.   http://www.ask.com/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States

Our government spends over one half of the world military expenditure. Our military budget is greater than the next 168 largest national military budgets combined. It is more than six times the military expenditure of China.


At present we have military troops stationed all over the world. It has been estimated that there are over 700 military detachments on foreign soil. The following is a list of major U.S. bases located overseas. Very few of these are actually necessary for our defense.




ARMY CAMPS




Armstrong Army Heliport, Buedingen, Hessen, Germany


Brasschaat Army Airfield, Brasschaat, Belgium


Bucholz Army Airfield, Kwajalein Atoll, Kiribati, Marshall Islands


Camp Able-Sentry, Macedonia, Skopje


Camp Bondsteel (Army), Kosovo, Urosevac, Serbia


Camp Comanche, Bosnia-Herzegowina


Camp Doha, Kuwait City, Kuwait


Camp Eagle (Army), Wonju, Korea


Camp Gary Owen (Army), Munsan, Korea


Camp Henry (Army), Taegu, Korea


Camp Monteith, Kosovo, Gnjilane, Serbia


Camp Page (Army), Chunchon, Korea


Camp Udairi, Kuwait City, Kuwait


Camp Walker (Army), Taegu, Korea


Cochran Army Airfield, Camp Stanley (Uijongbu), Korea


Coleman Army Airfield, Mannheim, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany


Combat Maneuver Training Center (CMTC) - Hohenfels AAF, Regensburg, Bayern, Germany


Conn Barracks (AHP Schweinfurt), Schweinfurt, Bayern, Germany


Fort Kobbe (Army), Colon, Panama


Hanau Army Airfield, Hanau, Hessen, Germany


Heidelberg Army Airfield, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany


Hohenfels Army Airfield, Hohenfels (Regensburg), Bayern, Germany


Kastner Army Airfield, Camp Zama, Japan


Katterbach Barracks Army Airfield, Ansbach, Bayern, Germany


Mayaguana Army Airfield, Mayaguana, Bahamas


Patton Barracks (AAF Heidelberg), Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany


Schweinfurt Army Heliport, Schweinfurt, Bayern, Germany


Storck Barracks Army Airfield, Illesheim, Bayern, Germany


Stuttgart Army Airfield, Stuttgart-Echterdingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany


Wiesbaden Army Airfield, Wiesbaden-Erbenheim, Hessen, Germany




AIR FORCE BASES




Ahmed Al Jaber Air Base, Kuwait


Akrotiri Royal Air Force Base, Akrotiri, Cyprus


Al Dhafra Air Base, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates


Al Udeid Air Base, Al Udeid, Qatar


Alconbury Royal Air Force Base, Huntingdon (Cambridgeshire), UK


Ali Air Base, Nasiriyah, Iraq


Ali Al Salem Air Base, Kuwait


Andersen Air Base, Yigo, Guam


Aviano Air Base, Aviano, Pordenone, Italy


Bagram Air Base, Parvan, Charikar, Afghanistan


Balad Air Base, Balad, Iraq


Bitburg Air Base, Bitburg, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany


Camp Adder (Ali Air Base), Nasiriyah, Iraq


Camp Anaconda (Balad Air Base), Balad, Iraq


Cha Shan Air Base, Hualien, Taiwan


Cheong Ju Air Base, Cheong Ju, Korea


Clark Air Base, Balibago (Luzon), Philippines


Croughton Royal Air Force Base, UK


Diego Garcia (Air Force), Diego Garcia, BIOT


Einsiedlerhof Air Station, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany


Eloy Alfaro Air Base, Manta, Ecuador


Eskan Village Air Base, Saudi Arabia


Fairford Royal Air Force Base, Fairford (Gloucestershire), UK


Feltwell Royal Air Force Base, Thetford (Norfolk), UK


Ganci Air Base (Manas Intl. Airport), Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan


Geilenkirchen Air Base (NATO), Geilenkirchen, NRW, Germany


Ghedi Air Base, Vicenza, Italy


Greenham Common Royal Air Force Base, Greenham (Newbury), UK


Hahn Air Base, Hahn, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany


Howard Air Base, Panama City, Panama


Hualien Air Base (Cha Shan), Hualien, Taiwan


Incirlik Air Base, Adana, Turkey


Istres Air Base, Istres, France


Izmir Air Base, Izmir, Turkey


Kadena Air Base, Kadena, Okinawa, Japan


Kandahar Air Base, Kandahar, Afghanistan


Kapaun Air Station (KNCOA), Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany


Khanabad Air Base, Khanabad, Uzbekistan


Khost Airbase, Paktia, Khost, Afghanistan


Kimhae Air Base, Pusan, Korea


King Abdul Aziz Air Base, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia


King Fahd Air Base, Taif, Saudi Arabia


King Khalid Air Base, Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia


Kunsan Air Base, Kunsan City, Korea


Lajes Field Air Base, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal


Lakenheath Royal Air Force Base, Lakenheath (Suffolk), UK


Mazar-e-Sharif Airbase, Mazar-e-Sharif, Afghanistan


Mildenhall Royal Air Force Base, Mildenhall (Suffolk), UK


Misawa Air Base, Misawa, Honshu, Japan


Molesworth Royal Air Force Base, Huntingdon (Cambridgeshire), UK


Moron Air Base, Sevilla, Spain


Osan Air Base, Osan, Korea


Paya Lebar Air Base, Sembawang, Singapore


Ramstein Air Base, Ramstein, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany


Rhein-Main Air Base, Frankfurt/Main, Hessen, Germany


Richmond Royal Australian Air Force Base, Australia


Riyadh Air Base, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia


San Vito dei Normanni Air Station, Brindisi, Italy


Sembach Air Base, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany


Seoul Air Base (K-16), Seoul, Korea


Soesterberg Air Base, Soesterberg, Netherlands


Sola Sea Air Base, Norway


Soto Cano Air Base (Camp Picket), Comayagua, Honduras


Spangdahlem Air Base, Spangdahlem, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany


Stavanger Air Base, Stavanger, Norway


Suwon Air Base, Seoul, Korea


Taegu Air Base (K-2), Taegu, Korea


Tallil Air Base, Nasiriyah, Iraq


Taszar Air Base, Pecs, Hungary


Thule Air Base, Thule, Greenland, Denmark


Torrejon Air Base, Torrejon, Spain


Upper Heyford Royal Air Force Base,


Upwood Royal Air Force Base, Ramsey (Cambridgeshire), UK


Woomera Air Station, Woomera, Australia


Yokota Air Base, Tokyo, Honshu, Japan


Zweibruecken Air Base, Zweibruecken, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany






NAVAL BASES AND STATIONS




Andreos Island Naval Air Station, Bahamas


Munoz Air National Guard Base, San Juan (IAP), Puerto Rico


Borinquen Coast Guard Air Station, Aguadilla, Puerto Rico


Futenma Marine Corps Air Station, Okinawa, Japan


Keflavik Naval Air Station, Reykjanes, Iceland


Guantanamo Bay Naval Air Station, Cuba


Cubi Point Naval Air Station (Subic Bay), Olongapo City, Philippines


Atsugi Naval Air Facility, Sagamino, Honshu, Japan


Guam Naval Base, Guam


La Maddalena Naval Support Activity, Sardinia, La Maddalena, Italy


Lajes Field Naval Air Station, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal


Naples Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy


Yokosuka Naval Station, Yokohama, Honshu, Japan


Subic Bay Naval Base, Olongapo City (Luzon), Philippines


Roosevelt Roads Naval Air Station, Caguas, Puerto Rico


Rota Naval Air Station, Rota, Spain


Sigonella Naval Air Station, Sigonella, Sicily, Italy


Souda Bay Naval Support Activity, Chania (Crete), Greece



Why do we need this world deployment of U.S. forces? The expense to maintain these bases is mind boggling.
Imagine the accomplishments we could make if we could channel this money into social programs, health care, education, medical research and scientific research.


MILITARY: BUSINESS AS USUAL


As I mentioned; in another life time (Solzhenitsyn) I was a career military man. One thing I can state for certain is that the military spends like a teenager with a credit card. They pay too much and buy things they don’t need. We want our military to be the best armed and best trained in the world; however, we are stuck in a mentality of tradition that is costing our government trillions of dollars.


One huge chunk of our military budget goes to maintaining five separate and distinct military organizations (not including Homeland Security) that overlap in order to do one job – protect the United States.


Each one of our military organizations has distinctive uniforms. When I was an enlisted man in the Navy I had two summer uniforms, two winter uniforms, two dress uniform and three working uniforms which I had to maintain. Granted, the maintenance of these uniforms were at my expense after the initial issue, however the government had to contract with clothing manufacturers to produce the distinct pieces of clothing apparel. Add to this list a pea coat, rain coat, working jacket, fatigue jacket, shoes, boots, hats, flight suites, flight jackets etc, and you can see how the expense adds up – Navy officers had totally different sets of uniforms of their own.

If we multiply uniform expenses times four, for the Army, Navy/ Coast Guard, Marine Corps and Air Force, you can visualize the cost to the defense department just in uniform contracts (Coast Guard and Navy share the same uniforms.)


And then there is equipment: the Navy has a grey flashlight, the Army has a green flashlight, the Air Force has a blue flashlight – each one of these had to be produced to military specifications under contract which included research and development: In other words, expensive, identical, flashlights of different colors. The list is unending; military equipment, including vehicles is duplicated for each specific branch.


Major crossover expenditures come in aircraft. Here there is more duplication. We have the Air Force, Naval/Coast Guard Aviation, Marine Corps Aviation and Army Aviation. Each of the branches issues contract for research and development of aircraft specific to their needs. Each branch has its own training commands that train pilots and support personnel to fly and maintain their specific aircraft. All of these aviation missions could and should be transferred to the Air Force, which could operate them cheaper with multipurpose aircraft.


See Military Budget of the United States.


Combining the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Coast Guard and Home Land Security into one force (U.S. Forces) makes sense. The defense department would have to supply only one set of uniforms, one set of equipment, one set of training commands per mission, one administrative branch and one supply corp. This merger alone would save the government at least a quarter of its defense budget.


Why don’t we do this? Can you imagine the flack the politicians would have to take from veterans groups? No more Army, Marine Corps, Coastguard, Navy, Air Force – just American Forces. How would it work?


U.S. MILITARY COMBINED FORCES

It would take a strong, resolute president to assert him or herself as Commander-and-Chief to totally reorganize the military. As Commander-and-Chief I do not believe the President would require Congressional approval for the reorganization. Reorganization would be extremely unpopular with military veterans who live in past glories. The outcries would be horrendous, but the results would increase our security and decrease out expenditures.


Suggestions for a leaner meaner combined force:

• Organize the military into five specialized units: ground command, air command, sea command, homeland command and support command. Each command would have a specific mission with no duplication.

1. Air command assigned all missions of aviation nature.

2. Sea command assigned all missions of sea security.

3. Ground command assigned all missions requiring ground troops.

4. Homeland command assigned all missions effecting homeland security, including response to natural disasters such as fire, flood and earth quake relief.

5. Support command assigned joint administrative, supply and medical support.

6. All commands would have specialized training but work cooperatively under one central command i.e. the air command would be tasked to supply air support for the other three commands, as needed.

• The defense department would adopt one set of uniforms – distinguishing each command by unique rank insignias and different color berets.

• Equipment would be standardized

• Where possible commercially available materials and equipment would be purchased in place of more expensive government contracted designs.

By drastically reorganizing the military we could cut waste and duplication. Our military should be strictly a defensive force. With the technology and weaponry we have, we should be able to decrease the size of our military and increase our secure, while cutting our total military expenditures by at least fifty-percent.



THE U.S. AS WORLD GESTAPOS

If we are to bring military expenditure under control, we can not continue with a world police mentality. We must restructure our military to a formidable defensive force

We can not and should not police the world. We will not survive as the world power if we hold all countries we disagree with under the threat of an American first strike. The cost is too great in lives and money and world opinion for us to engage in continual warfare.

There are countries where military intervention should take place. Nations in chaos like Darfur should be occupied by United Nation’s troops and the killing of civilians not tolerated. It is not, however, the place of the United States to go it alone. And, it is not the place for the United States to form a coalition and intercede. If we unconditionally backed the United Nations, supported it financially and militarily, and accepted the U.N. resolutions as law we could turn over the job of world police to the world body. Without our world wide police actions they would have to step up.

Here we have dealt with the financial cost of supporting the largest, most expensive military in the world, and the effect on the national budget and by extension the effect on our inability to fund social programs.



The problem in defense spending is to figure out how far you should go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without.
President Eisenhower

We have not focused on the morality of war.

War is like fire in the human community, one whose fuel is living people.
Dalai Lama


I will propose a simple solution to war:

The reason our leaders do not flinch sending our young men into battle is because they have no personal vested interest in the mortality of the outcome.

I propose that when countries are destine for conflict, we should take the major political leaders ( ie. President, Speaker Of The House, Leader Of The Senate, and the Minority Leaders From Both Houses) of the United States and pair them with the top six leaders of the opposing country; we should strip them all naked, give each two single edged razor blades, and place them in a small room and cut the lights out. The first ones to surrender are the losers and must accept the terms of the winners.

If this was the recipe for war - there would be no wars.