When you already have the best candy bar, why confuse it?
The candy counter should be: Snickers, Milky Way, Butterfinger, Payday, Hershey's Chocolate, and Reese's Peanut Cups. One of each.
That's enough!
the Ol'Buzzard
DID I RUN AND AM I TIRED?
When you already have the best candy bar, why confuse it?
The candy counter should be: Snickers, Milky Way, Butterfinger, Payday, Hershey's Chocolate, and Reese's Peanut Cups. One of each.
That's enough!
the Ol'Buzzard
I recently
bought a $2.00 Maine Megabucks ticket.
I picked the magic numbers that assure a win:
11111 and 1
for the Megaball.
Surprising? No.
I have the exact
same odds of winning with straight 1’s as any other group of mixed numbers: 1
in 4,496,388.
I think I’ll
spend my next $2.00 on a Snickers candy bar; at least I’m guaranteed a sugar
rush from that.
the Ol’Buzzard
I have often
written about the human race’s march toward annihilation: overpopulation, climate
change, a meteor storm, an asteroid strike, the danger of sentient GAI; but the
real Damocles' sword is a human race hardwired for violence and war, with
aging, psychotic, religious, geopolitical leaders, launching one or more of the 12,000 nuclear warheads that now exist.
Countries in
NATO have had no reason to pursue nuclear armament, as they have felt protected
under the United States nuclear umbrella and the NATO alliance.
Now, with
the threats of withdrawal from NATO and the removal of troops from Germany and
Poland, countries can no longer count on America’s commitments of shared
protection. We are increasing the chances for a new nuclear arms race, and may
see a renewed effort to acquire nuclear weapons by countries across the globe to
ensure their own sovereignty.
Germany,
Poland, Ukraine, Sweden, Finland, Australia, Saudi Arabia, Iran; each feeling vulnerable
without a nuclear weapon.
Look what
happened to Ukraine. They had nuclear weapons,
but disarmed between 1994 and 2001. Had
they maintained their nuclear arsenal, Russia would not have attacked.
Every new nuclear-capable
entity will exponentially increase the danger of a nuclear exchange.
We are not
eternal.
the OL’Buzzard
I feel sorry
for my brothers in arms who wear a ball cap proclaiming their Vietnam service,
as if that was the high point of their lives.
No one chose
to be there. No one was killed or wounded
by choice. 58,000 died, and most of those were between the ages of 18 and 25.
And that
58,000 number was probably a low-ball number manipulated by the government; not
an actual count; not accounting for people who later died from war wounds,
injuries, toxic poisoning, and suicide…
I am sure the number would be well over 100,000.
Ask a Vietnam
vet why he was there, and he can’t tell you.
It was politicians moving around pieces on a checker board, and vets
were the expendable pieces.
We weren’t
there to support a democratic government in the south. We were there to establish and support the Tan
Son Nhut Air Base, giving us a nuclear threat presence on the southern border
of China. It was all about China. It was geopolitical politics.
China did
not want an American nuclear presence on its southern border any more than we
wanted a Russian nuclear presence in Cuba, on our southern border.
We could
have, at any time, moved into the north and taken Hanoi, but that would have
brought China into the war.
China did
not want open war with the US any more than we wanted war with China, so we
armed the south, they armed the north, and we fought to a stalemate that, for
fifteen years, maintained a status quo, allowing us to maintain the geographic
nuclear threat on the Chinese southern border.
Finally, the
death toll of American forces became too much to hide, and anti-war activism
threatened the politicians in office; so we retreated with our tails between
our legs – we surrendered the war – we accepted our death toll as having
accomplished nothing, cut our losses, and came home ignobly.
A Vietnam vet
wearing a hat proclaiming his service is equivalent to a rape victim wearing a
hat with a picture of her rapist.
WE were both
violently fucked.
the Ol’Buzzard
DEI has always been promoted by the Democratic Party and always rejected by Republicans.
I was raised
in Mississippi during segregation. I
witnessed first-hand the degradation and suffering of the Black community.
The Supreme
Court’s dismantling of the Voting Rights Act is turning back the clock on Civil
Rights; a step back for racial equality.
That said, I
feel that some DEI is past its time.
In college admissions, minority racial groups have been given preferential consideration. I believe that preferential consideration based on race is past its sell-by date
We can still
debate the need for race-based DEI hiring, housing, and other issues.
the
Ol’Buzzard
Yesterday I
sold a set of snowshoes to a retired State Trooper in northern Maine. It dawned on me that I was seeing a
generational divide that goes further than old people aren’t techno-savvy.
I was seeing
a gap in basic values between the old and the young. I had had those snowshoes advertised for two
years, and no one showed interest. This was
because wooden snowshoes are large and heavy.
You can buy aluminum snowshoes that are small and lightweight.
But it goes
beyond that: My snowshoes were made by a person. Someone shaped the wood, steamed
it until pliable, formed it on a jig, then someone with skill laced them with
leather thongs, varnished them, and put their stamp on them.
I bought the
shoes in 1976 - fifty years ago. I have
revarnished them numerous times. I stored them carefully when not in use. The value of these shoes, to me, was more
than just their use. I cared about them
and took care of them.
Who cares
about a factory-bent oblong piece of aluminum with a plastic sheet
filling?
I have a
Silva compass that is sixty years old, a pocket knife that is ageless…
What does a
young person have today that they value so highly they will still have it fifty
years from now? Their cell phone?