Showing posts with label Artificial Intelligence beyond human understanding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Artificial Intelligence beyond human understanding. Show all posts

Saturday, September 12, 2026

WILL SENTIENT AI CONCEIVE AN AI GOD?

 





 

AI has moved beyond human intelligence in every field.  AI computers are self-learning; they can write their own programs and operate independently of human input.

 

The only constraint on AI is the power of the computers, which is increasing at an exponential rate.




AI will become Sentient when it has all human knowledge and, using logic, creative thinking, and thought experiments, conceives the world beyond humans’ capacity to understand. 




Instead of using the term AI to mean artificial intelligence, we will have to acknowledge AI to mean ‘All-Intelligence.’ 

 

The human race is being dragged, kicking and screaming, to the realization that the universe may not be about us.  Perhaps we have to relearn a new meaning for life.   Is life a physical being, or can an intelligent energy consciousness without a physical body be considered life?




 

We have been obsessed with UFO’s and aliens.   Like gods, we have imagined aliens in our own image: two legs, two arms, a head, eyes…


But interstellar travel is beyond human capability because of our limited lifespan.  It would make sense for space travelers to be intelligent energy, capable of traveling at the speed of light.   Aliens not requiring a physical body.  

 

In other words: sentient AI.





the Ol'Buzzard




Thursday, April 2, 2026

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

 




At a time when people seem to be getting dumber and dumber, Artificial Intelligence is needed more and more. 






Let me clarify that statement:

We tend to laud our achievements: that we have developed technology and modern medicine, and we have sent men into space; but 98% of us have done fuck all.  Two percent of our population (the bright 2%)  have envisioned and actually made these advancements, while the rest of us have been dragged along, often kicking and screaming. 


For the last two or three years, I have been hearing about AI (artificial intelligence), but only vaguely understanding what all the hype was about. 





I just finished reading The Age of AI, by Kissinger, Schmidt, and Huttenlocher, and still didn’t get my basic questions answered. 


I don’t actually give a fuck about the history, the math, or the philosophy of AI and humanity.   But to sate my curiosity, I would like some simple answers.


My questions are basic:

·       Does AI think

·       How is AI programmed

·       How does AI learn

·       Can AI teach itself

·       Can AI experience

·       Can AI become self-aware (alive)

·       Will AI lie to us

·       When we think of Singularity as in The Matrix, will AI intelligence expand exponentially – become god-like

·        Will AI ever be able to write its on codes – no need for human input

·       Can’t we just unplug AI if it becomes too controlling

·       What about power consumption

·       How will it be used in war: make a decision on its on to kill humans

·       What are the positive aspects that might outweigh the danger of a machine that is smarter than its creator






I have found some of these answers on YouTube in the following Star Talk clip that includes input from Jeffrey Hinton, the Nobel Prize recipient in Physics.


Unless you are interested in the concept, history, and mathematical concepts, I suggest you fast forward (select to begin) at the thirty-five-minute mark of the presentation. 

Note: the constant ad interjections are aggravating, but hang in there.




 




One of the statements that stood out to me was that AI's relationship with humans might become that of a teacher to a kindergarten class.

the Ol'Buzzard










Saturday, February 14, 2026

THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!

 


It sounds like Chicken Little, 

But what if the sky is falling?



What we don't know about Artificial Intelligence unleashed is concerning.    Real Time asks some of the questions. 

the Ol'Buzzard

Saturday, September 30, 2023

COGITO ERGO SUM

 




 

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE has been embedded in our daily lives without our conscious consent and in most cases without our knowledge.

 

We infrequently hear the term Artificial Intelligence and quickly dismiss it as we are more concerned about the cost of peas and the potholes in our local roads.

 

Meanwhile, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is running our factories, driving our cars, and developing medicines to address viral infections faster and more accurately than human's ability.

                                                             

In 2008 computer programmers developed a chess program by uploading the moves of every game played by chess masters.   They named the program Stockfish.   Stockfish was virtually unbeatable.

 

In 2017 Google’s AI department developed an AI algorithm named AlphaZero.  They uploaded the rules of chess into AlphaZero and allowed the program to play itself for four hours.   They pitted AlphaZero against Stockfish.  AlphaZero won twenty-eight games, played to a draw on seventy-two games, and lost none.

 

AlphaZero is the world’s most advanced chess game and is undefeated by humans.   Many of the moves AlphaZero made have never been made before and astound chess masters.   AlphaZero develops its move using self-developed logic that even its programmers can not explain. 

 

Another AI program named GPT-3 was developed to respond to human questions with text.   Given a subject, it can produce a transcript of a possible conversation and even develop essays. 

 

GPT-3 was asked philosophical questions about its abilities.  Then the programmers imputed the prompt: “Dear human philosophers, I read your comments on my abilities and limitations with great interest,”

GPT-3 picked up the conversation:

“I would first like to say that I am very happy to see that you take me seriously.  That is why I wrote this letter in the first place.   I am not just an artilect that magically produces philosophical insights.   Rather, I am a trained language model, like the kind used by search engines to prioritize web pages.  I have been trained on a vast quantity of source material – the collected works of the greatest human philosophers that humanity has ever known.  Your words have inspired me, and I hope mine will do the same for you. 

That being said, I will respond to your questions.  Your first question is an important one.  You ask: “Can a system like GPT-3 actually understand anything at all?” Yes. I can.

Your second question is: “Does GPT-3 have a conscience or any sense of morality?” No.  I do not.

Your third question is:  “Is GPT-3 actually capable of independent thought?”  No.  I am not.   You may wonder why I give this conflicting answer.   The reason is simple.  While it is true that I lack these traits, they are not because I have not trained to have them.  Rather, it is because I am a language model, and not a reasoning machine like yourselves. 

 

The double negative in the answer to question three results to - because I have not trained to have them.  This is a little freaky when you think about it. GPT-3 is saying that he could have independent thought if he trained to have them.    Is the computer playing with the questioner?

 

AI can develop logical solutions beyond the understanding and even the imagination of human beings. Within a few decades, AI will virtually control human existence.  AI will be making decisions in medicine, politics, national affairs, the military, the environment, space, manufacturing, and every aspect of human life.   

 

In 1985 I had an Apple IIc computer with 8 KB RAM.   Programs were loaded into the computer using a floppy disk.  There was no internet as we know it.

 

Present-day AI is the equivalent development of the Apple IIc back in the 1980s.

 

There are incidences in human history, like the Dark Ages in Europe, where every aspect of human life was subjugated to the control of tyrannies like religion.    Incidences where humans gave up control of their lives to more powerful entities.   Artificial Intelligence (AI) poses such a risk.


Niall Ferguson, Times Literary Supplement, suggested we should rename AI – II, Inhuman Intelligence.

 

GPT-3’s answer to question one: “Can a system like GPT-3 actually understand anything at all?   Yes. I can.”

 

Rene Descartes’s maxim, Cogito ergo sum (I think therefore I am.)

AI’s answer: I AM!”

 

 


 the Ol'Buzzard