The term ‘art of sex’ might appeal to a teenager
or a frustrated celibate; but I find sex as an art is not desirable. Any time you move something to an art form
you are becoming to cerebral: it speaks of planning and orchestrating and
evaluating. To be really enjoyed, sex -
like life - should be spontaneous: a spontaneous melding of mutual desires that
build to an emotional climax and leave both parties exhausted and elated.
The teachings of Zen tell us
to live spontaneously. We are told not
to dwell on what happened yesterday or what might happen tomorrow, but to
accept each moment and make decisions as they arise - and then move on.
The teachings of ZEN can be
an enigma. And to understand ZEN we
need to understand Buddhism.
I propose there are four
distinct disciplines of Buddhism.
Without getting mired in difficult names, histories, double talk and rituals
we can look at the divisions geographically.
Southeast Asian Buddhism is
probably the most popular. This is the
Buddhism of Compassion. It is the
belief that a person can not become enlightened (at one with the world) without
being involved in humanity. Compassionate
Buddhist are concerned about war and human suffering and the welfare of all
living things. Meditation is a big part
of their path to enlightenment. and they believe that true Buddhism can be
achieved only through being involved in a community of Buddhist – they stress
the need for a teacher.
Tibetan Buddhism is the least
understandable for our western minds.
Tibetan Buddhism is ripe with gods and demons and spirits. The more educated Tibetans now living in
exile say the deities are the personification of human conditions. That may be true today; but from the
earliest time through the twentieth century Tibetan Buddhist were fearful of
the actual physical existence of demons.
Tibetan Buddhists believe in reincarnation and that human life is the
top of the life cycles. A person who
lives an unselfish religious life may opt out of the cycle. People who are evil and unwholesome and
unworthy are doomed to repeat the cycle in a lower animal form (take
four.) Because Tibetan Buddhists see
all non-human life forms as some step of reincarnation they worry about killing
the simplest living creature – walking
on bugs. Tibetan Buddhism, like Tibetan culture, has
been practically eradicated by the Chinese government.
The third is Chinese Buddhism,
which no longer really exists as a viable religion. The Chinese government now licenses the
monks and the state controls the laity to make sure that the Buddhist monasteries
don’t operate contrary to the People’s
Socialist Agenda. The government
has even appointed a new Dali Lama.
Japan was the last Eastern country to adopt Buddhism, and
they modified the form to what is now known as ZEN. They
distilled the teachings of the Buddha to focus on the wellbeing of the
individual. The premise of ZEN is that by
disciplining the mind through meditation an individual can come to understand
the causes of his or her suffering and discontent, and lead a more full and
appreciative life in each day and each moment.
Buddhism was never a religion
that moved in to replace other existing religions. Because of the simplicity of the teachings we
might view Buddhism as a chameleon: able
to absorb the existing tenets and offer a non-threatening combination.
In India Buddhist teachings
melded with Hinduism; In Tibet
it melded with the mystic religion Bon. In China
it melded with Taoism; and when it moved to Japan it distilled the teachings to
adapt to that culture.
Each of theses divisions,
stemming from the Buddha’s teaching, added and subtracted and in doing so
veered away from the simple enlightenment of the Buddha. Each claims to be the pure belief, just as
the Catholic Church claims to be the true Christian religion. And though, in my opinion, ZEN is the
closest to the Buddha’s path to enlightenment, even ZEN has cloaked itself in
vestments and ceremony that the Buddha never condoned.
In my next post I will
discuss the actual practice of ZEN as taught in numerous Sanghas (Zen communities) throughout the US.
An in the final post I will
describe Buzzard Zen: the back to the basics that I fall into and out of like a
fat person trying to diet.
the Ol’Buzzard
Much of what is written here will not agree with the
teachings available at sangha’s and the literature at book stores. I have read and considered myself a Buddhist
since the seventies. As I believe all
established Buddhist sects today have veered away from the simple basic
teachings of the Buddha – I do not blindly accept the necessity of belonging to
a group or of submitting my will and intellect to a teacher.
Believe nothing, no matter
were you heard it or who said it, unless it agrees with your common sense.
(attributed to the Buddha)