Possibly ,because I have no family to trace, I have always decried genealogy research as somewhat ridiculous. With a science/math background I tend to look at things pragmatically. Generations increase exponentially going downward - where as populations decrease going downward. At some point your exponentially generation count will surpass the world population.
By your ninth generation you literally have over a thousand direct ancestors. Any one of those decedents only represent one one-thousandth of your DNA. Realistically not enough to actually claim kindship.
Somewhere between 1490 and 1470 your ancestors, counted exponentially, surpass the entire world population (400 million approx. world population - 738 million ancestors - circa 1470.)
This of course is ridiculous. Obviously along the line your generations become incestuous: wives with multiple husbands and husbands with multiple wives and sexual relations between brothers and sisters, cousins, aunts and uncles - and of course: I'm my own grandpa.
Young women have typically started families by age twenty; therefore, I have used twenty years as the time interval for previous generations
Chart for
someone born in 1950 #
# You can adjust the Date up or down by 20 year increments to determine your generational numbers.
DATE |
GENERATION |
GRANDFATHERS |
GRANDMOTHERS |
1950 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1930 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
1910 |
3 |
8 |
8 |
1890 |
4 |
16 |
16 |
1870 |
5 |
32 |
32 |
1850 |
6 |
64 |
64 |
1830 |
7 |
128 |
128 |
1810 |
8 |
256 |
256 |
1790 |
9 |
512 |
512 |
1770 |
10 |
1,024 |
1,024 |
1750 |
11 |
2,048 |
2,048 |
1730 |
12 |
4,096 |
4,096 |
1710 |
13 |
8,192 |
8,192 |
1690 |
14 |
16,384 |
16,384 |
1670 |
15 |
32,768 |
32,768 |
1650 |
16 |
65,536 |
65,536 |
1630 |
17 |
131,072 |
131,072 |
1610 |
18 |
262,144 |
262,144 |
1590 |
19 |
524,288 |
524,288 |
1570 |
20 |
1,048,576 |
1,048,576 |
1550 |
21 |
2,097,152 |
2,097,152 |
1530 |
22 |
4,194,304 |
4,194,304 |
1510 |
23 |
8,388,608 |
8,388,608 |
1490 |
24 |
16,777,216 |
16,777,216 |
1780 |
1770 |
1760 |
1750 |
1740 |
1730 |
1720 |
1710 |
1700 |
1690 |
1680 |
1670 |
1660 |
1650 |
1640 |
1630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2780369 |
2148076 |
1593625 |
1170760 |
905563 |
629445 |
466185 |
331711 |
250888 |
210372 |
151507 |
111935 |
75058 |
50368 |
26634 |
4646 |
Estimated
Population of the United States 1630 to 1780
#Young
women have typically started families by age twenty; therefore, I have used
twenty years as the time interval for previous generations
year |
1400 |
1500 |
1600 |
1700 |
1800 |
1900 |
Sept. 2021 |
|
population |
400 |
500 |
600 |
700 |
900 |
1.6 |
8.08 |
|
|
Million |
Million |
Million |
Million |
Million |
Billion |
Billion |
|
Estimated
world population
# You can
adjust the Date up or down by 20 year increments to determine your generational
numbers.
You are, of course, absolutely right, Ol'Buzzard! Isn't the phenomenon you refer to called "Generational Collapse" or something like that? I think it amply demonstrates that, in the end, we are all related to everyone else in the entire world, aren't we. We are all family in a profound kind of way. Which makes the human desire to exploit, harm, discriminate against and kill even more ridiculous and unforgivable than it already is.
ReplyDeleteObviously along the line your generations become incestuous: wives with multiple husbands and husbands with multiple wives and sexual relations between brothers and sisters, cousins, aunts and uncles
ReplyDeleteI disagree with the incestuous suggestion. In cattle it is called back crossing. With people it is second, third, and fourth cousins marrying which is perfectly fine and natural, especially when dealing with limited ability to travel and the whole tribal business.