the Ol'Buzzard
Monday, May 25, 2015
Friday, May 22, 2015
THE MYSTERIOUS MIND OF WOMEN.
Let me
preface this by saying that I love my wife.
But even after thirty-five years I am still at a loss to the mysterious
workings of her female mind.
I have a big
comfortable chair that I sit in to read.
Behind that chair is a large, three bulb, bright pole lamp – I prefer a
bright light when I am reading.
My wife
likes to read on the couch, and she has a much more attractive pole lamp she
reads by: this lamp is not as bright which is her preference.
My light is
old and has needed rewiring since I bought it used fifteen years ago. I finally decided to take the lamp up to my
possible room – man cave – den, writing room, junk room… and take it apart to rewire. In the meantime I brought down the pole lamp
that I use next to my computer and desk.
My wife doesn't like this light - it’s ugly – and it is too bright; but
I like a bright light and I don’t mind the switch.
When I get
the light downstairs my wife absolutely insist that I place it beside the couch
for her to use and move her light over by my chair.
I complain loud and long that her light is
not bright enough for my liking; but the dye is cast, and even though I
constantly grumble and complain I have to read by the damn dull light. Meanwhile the light that I brought
downstairs – the one she can’t stand – is placed by the couch and she has to
aim it toward the bookcase because she says it is too bright????
I have to
admit that I don’t understand this mysterious female logic; but after two week
of reading misery I finally got hot and rewired the old pole light, brought it
downstairs and placed it by my chair and moved her light back by the couch. She is perfectly satisfied with this
arrangement.
I have
pondered and pondered her female thought process in this matter and am at a
loss. It couldn't possibly be that this
whole light-switching was to motivate me to get the old lamp rewired, could it?
Are
women that wily?
I feel like
I have been played.
the Ol’Buzzard
Labels:
Dueling minds,
Logic,
Men and Women,
Men's Brains,
Women's Brains
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
GLOBAL POWER; BUT AT WHAT COST?
It is a little late for asking this question.
At this point nothing can change.
It is a mindset -
We convince ourselves we need this.
But at what cost?
the Ol'Buzzard
Friday, May 15, 2015
THE THRILL IS GONE!
Good Buy Old Friend: Though I never met you
You kept me company through many a long night.
the Ol'Buzzard
BUZZARD BARF
A SCATOLOGY QUESTION
Did you ever have one of those small farts that result in a fart bubble working its way up the crack of your ass?
I just did.
It is kind of funny when you think about it - and a real ZEN moment if you focus on it.
the Ol'Buzzard
GMO: GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM
Liberal
environmentalist (of which I am one) seem to have a knee jerk reaction to
anything that changes the environment.
We often focus on some perceived violation blinding ourselves to the
overall picture – I hate to use this phrase: the greater good.
Genetically
modified organisms carry a sinister connotation. It brings to mind some Frankenstein plant
that will come up from the laboratory and kill us all: a time for us to break
out the torches and pitch forks and storm the castle and dispatch the monster –
preferably on a dark and stormy night.
We have been
doing genetic modification for centuries.
Hybrid tomato plants: those perfect tomatoes we buy at the supermarket have
been genetically modified through selective breeding; all the beef we buy at
the supermarket has been cross bred (genetically modified) to improve beef
production. Nature has genetically
modified all of creation through evolution.
Now we have the ability to do the
same thing through manipulation of DNA strands.
Genetically modified corn uses less water, is more disease and insect resistant and produces a higher yield. Genetically modified crops require less pesticides than regular crops.
A farmer I knew in Kentucky nearly doubled his corn yield by switching to genetically modified corn and planting with Round UP. Before we get all huffy and puffy – everything we buy at the supermarket that is not organic has been sprayed with pesticides and chemicals of some type.
Don’t get me wrong – Monsanto is in it for the profit; but, it requires science and somebody has to do it.
The
necessity to genetically modify our food supply is to insure it survive and
thrive in an environment changed by global warming, allowing us to increase
production to feed the ever expanding human population on the earth.
The biggest
environmental problem that exist – the core cause of all polluting and climate
change is over population. The earth
now has topped seven billion humans and is projected to reach ten billion by
2050 (a nearly fifty percent increase.)
We are using up natural resources at an alarming rate and creating
proportional increases in pollution.
Over population is the elephant in the room and we are ignoring it: people having more than two natural children are being environmentally irresponsible. The days of having six to a dozen children to work the farm in the 1920 when the world population was one billion perhaps suited that time; but that time has passed.
Over population is the elephant in the room and we are ignoring it: people having more than two natural children are being environmentally irresponsible. The days of having six to a dozen children to work the farm in the 1920 when the world population was one billion perhaps suited that time; but that time has passed.
My wife and
I try to eat organic food – we belong to a farm coop. However, small farming is not sustainable for
unchecked world population growth.
The world
water supply is dwindling and farmlands are becoming arid, resulting in famine and a
related increases in diseases.
If we are to meet the needs of a fifty percent population growth by 2050 it must be done through drought, disease and insect resistant plants genetically modified to increased yield. It is not the ideal solution but is a realistic, logical solution for the coming decades.
If we are to meet the needs of a fifty percent population growth by 2050 it must be done through drought, disease and insect resistant plants genetically modified to increased yield. It is not the ideal solution but is a realistic, logical solution for the coming decades.
Let’s not
forget that stem cell research allowing for genetic modification in human
beings is the future for curing such diseases as Cancer, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s
– soon we will all be genetically modified organisms - GMOs.
THIS IS NOT SCIENCE - THIS IS NOT ACCURATE.
the Ol'Buzzard
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
%2B-%2BCopy.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
