A HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT STUDENT VEHICLES
Last night in Maine a 16 year old
driver and his 16 year old passenger were killed in a fatal car crash. The state police said the driver was going
at an excessive rate of speed when he topped a hill sending him into the right
shoulder. Over-correcting he crossed into
the oncoming lane hitting another car head on.
The three passengers in the other vehicle were transported to local
hospitals and are in stable condition.
This begs the question of why
is a 16 year old allowed to drive a car unsupervised?
The Center for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) put out a fact sheet on teen driving fatalities in
2010. It found that young people ages
15-24 are 14% of the population but account for 30% of traffic injuries.
In 2010 for drivers age 16-19
there were 2,700 teen deaths and 282,000 injured. The CDC found that drivers age 16-19 were
three times more likely to be in a fatal crash than drivers over 20, with male
teens twice the risk of female teen drivers.
CDC Conclusions:
1.
Teen drivers tend
to underestimate dangerous situations, and the presence of teenage male
passengers increases the likely hood of risky behavior.
2.
Teens are more
likely to speed than older drivers: 39% of the fatal crashes involving teens
were the results of speeding.
3.
In 22% of the
fatal crashes the driver had been drinking.
4.
Teens have the
lowest rate of seat belt usage.
5.
One half of teen
deaths from motor vehicle crashes occurre between 3pm and midnight, with 55% of
these occurring on Friday, Saturday or Sunday.
The CDC went on to declare that
the answer to the teen accident rate is more driver training classes and the
possibility of graduated licensing.
They went on to say that parents were the key to safe driving.
The statistics were telling,
the conclusion right on, but the corrective measures were bull shit.
When you visit your local
high school you will find that the parking lot is overflowing with student
vehicles. When school is let out the
parking lot turns into the Indy-500.
Young male drivers rev their engines and burn rubber on their way onto
the rode system.
The fact is that 16 and 17
year old drivers should not be driving a motor vehicle without adult
supervision. They are not responsible
enough to understand the possible implications of their often irrational
behaviors. You would not allow a 16 or
17 year old to carry a fire arm to school but you allow them to drive an
automobile.
An 18 year old, that is old
enough to join the military, should be given the privilege of a driver’s
license. But, privilege is the optimal word.
Driving should be looked as a
privilege and not a right: Privileges should come with responsibility.
The bottom line is that we
have irresponsible teen age drivers on the road because parents support
it.
The only practical answer,
that will work, to address the dangers of teen driving - is legislation.
1.
A 16 year old
driver should not be allowed to drive an automobile without a licensed adult
(21 year old or older) supervising. They should only be issued learner permits until they turn 17.
2.
Drivers 17-19
years of age should be issued a Privilege License. This license should be contingent on safe
driving practices and any moving violation (speeding, reckless driving, any
amount of alcohol use - or alcohol in the vehicle) should result in the
revocation of the license to age twenty – no exceptions.
If the teens knew that their
privilege to drive hinged on their behavior behind the wheel they would protect
that privilege by driving responsibly.
A few teens would have to loose the privilege to drive to establish the
precedence.
Teens would not like this
solution, and many parents would object for fear they would end up having to
taxi their teens. I also believe that
our spineless politicians would be afraid to enact such a strict teen driving
regulation – for fear of voter backlash.
Where does that leave
us? Here in Maine, with two teens dead and three adults
in the hospital – and no means of teen behavior modification for teens driving
dangerously.
the Ol-Buzzard
|