What he said
the Ol'Buzzard
I am in my eighth decade. I have an undergraduate degree from the University of Maine and a graduate degree from the University of Alaska. I have taught elementary school, middle school and high school. I have been principal of four schools. Until two years ago when I watched the Watchmen television series, I had never heard of the Tulsa Massacre. At that time, I wasn’t sure whether it was historic or fiction…
It has
always annoyed me that history is heavily edited by the nation or state where
it occurred, in order to only show a positive image, while white washing any uncomfortable
realities.
The United
States is not ‘The shining city on the hill’ as President Regan
proclaimed. All nations are self-serving
with both laudable and despicable histories; but the positive aspects are the
only ones that get recorded in our history books.
Along with
attempted genocide of the Native population; the institution of slavery; being
the most warlike nation on earth (in two-hundred-forty-five years the U.S. has only experienced sixteen years of
peace); the confinement of Japanese American citizens in detention camps during
the Second World War; the bombing of two Japanese cities with nuclear weapons
killing almost a half-million civilians; racial violence in the integration of
the South, the confinement of children
and the confinement of parents seeking asylum into separate detention camps… is
the history not taught in our schools.
The good,
the bad, and the ugly are all a part of our history; and unless we truly teach history
in its entirety, we are doomed to repeat the atrocities.
The governor
of Oklahoma has signed a bill forbidding the history of the Tulsa massacre
being taught in Oklahoma schools. He reasons it would make white students feel uncomfortable.
If schools
won’t teach our history, parents should.
Only by citizens understanding our history, can we continually move
toward a more perfect Union.
I do not believe the sins of the parents fall to the children and the next generations. People are products of their time and their culture, and conform to those expectations.
I do not accept reverse racial profiling. I do not apologize for being white. I do not apologize that my great uncle was a member of the KKK. I do not laud that my great-great grandfather died in the battle of Shiloh fighting for the North. I am neither of those people. I have no racial animosity, though I know there are those who do - and that needs to change. I support Black Lives Matter; but I do not support civil anarchy and destruction of property by any side.
I see and understand the injustice suffered by the black population and support their cause. I feel that teaching accurate history can bring about more change than passing laws in a divided Congress and divided nation.
the Ol'Buzzard
On the
anniversary of Gorge Floyd’s death people are asking questions about the
competence of police departments in their hiring and supervision of officers.
I spent two
years in military police and I was a voluntary diver for the Clay County
Sheriff Department in Florida.
It is my perception that the best and the brightest are not necessarily attracted to a career in policing. Policing, to a large extent, attracts people who are enamored with the authority of the badge and a gun – and in some cases, people insecure in their own identity.
Notice the lead-lined sap gloves the officer is wearing while confronting the public, his right hand grasping his firearm.
There is an
intrinsic problem with authority that has never been addressed with police
policy and training:
In 1973 the
psychology department of Sanford University conducted and experiment concerning
prison guards and prisoners. Random
volunteers were taken from the University student body. To ensure randomness, the assignment of
prisoner or guard were alternately picked: prisoner-guard-prisoner-guard… Prisoners were placed in confinement and guards
were given free rein to control the prisoners.
The experiment was scheduled to last two weeks, but had to be terminated
after six days because of the aggression of the guards.
This same
domineering authority syndrome identified in the Sanford study permeates police
departments. Police, to a large extent,
do not act to assist civilians, but to dominate them. They feel a power to intimidate, and they
become aggressive when their authority is questioned. Being authorized to wield deadly force inflates
the ego of many officers; and when multiple officers back-up a call there is a
tendency for individual officers to become more aggressive.
The structure
of police departments is at fault.
Instead of armed authority, it should be public safety and assistance. It is an attitudinal change that is needed; a
change from ‘policing’ to service.
I am not anti-police. I have worked and associated with many policemen and they are basically good people; but their attitude toward the public-in-general is uniformly negative, and they carry a feeling of empowerment and authority. Many do not have the temperament to be trusted with weapons of deadly force when dealing with volatile situations, and their demeanor escalates the problem rather than subduing it.
We should
set the record straight. Supporters of
the status-quo of policing seem to feel that criticizing the police is
tantamount blasphemy. They always remind us of how dangerous the
job is. I have heard the comment, “when
a cop leaves his house in the morning his wife doesn’t know if he will come back
safely.” There is a misconception about
the danger of policing.
A study of
the most dangerous jobs in America, places police twenty-second:
JOB RELATED
DEATHS CORRELATED FROM 2018:
1. Loggers
2. Aircraft pilots and flight engineers
3. Derrick operators in oil and gas and
mining
4. Roofers
5. Garbage collectors
6. Iron workers
7. Delivery drivers
8. Farmers
9. Fire fighters
10.
Power
linemen
11.
Agriculture
workers
12.
Crossing
guards
13.
Crane
operators
14.
Construction
helpers
15.
Landscape
supervisors
16.
Highway
maintenance workers
17.
Cement
masons
18.
Small
engine mechanics
19.
Supervisors
of mechanics
20.
Heavy
vehicle maintenance
21.
Ground
maintenance workers
22.
Police
officers
23.
Maintenance
workers
24.
Construction
workers
25.
Mining
machine operators
There are numerous restrictions and requirements in the
Policing Bill now in Congress aimed at holding police officers and police departments
more accountable; but this bill will not bring about a culture change in police
departments.
The answer seems simple to me:
THE OL’BUZZARD’S POLICE REFORM RECOMMENDATION
ONE:
Increase the educational qualification for police applicants. It should require beyond a high-school
education, and an intense psychological evaluation.
TWO: Do not
defund the police – de-arm the police.
Police on duty and off duty should be unarmed. Weapons can be kept locked but available in
the patrol cars, and permission from the watch commander needed to access a
firearm. Ninety-nine-plus percent of
police interaction with the community doesn’t require carrying a firearm. Unarmed officers would deal less aggressively
with civilians, and in the heat of a confrontation the first instinct would not
be to shoot to kill.
THREE AND
FINALLY: Any officer killing another human
being in the line of duty, regardless of the circumstances, should be removed
from public policing and be placed in a support position of equal pay, but never
authorized to carry a firearm again.
I support police, and the job they do; but there are psychological
pressures and tendencies associated with the job that need to be addressed in selection, training and supervision of officers.
The culture of policing should be reformed – but this will never
happen in today’s social and political climate.
the Ol’Buzzard
There are still people running around with MAGA hats and Trump flags. This post is not for them, because they have become cult members and are past reasoning.
Let us put
some of our past history in perspective.
Osama bin Laden organized an attack on the United States of America in
2001. Two aircraft struck the Twin
Towers causing massive civilian loss of life, but the aircrafts sent to strike
the heart of our government, the Pentagon and the White House, failed to make
their target.
In 2021, twenty years later, Donald J Trump organized an attack on the heart of our government. He succeeded where Osama bin Laden failed. Trump’s cult of fanatics assaulted the Capitol of the United States while Congress and Senate were in session. They violently attacked, and overran the Capitol police, destroying property – including defecating and urinating in the Capitol rotunda. They ran through the halls of Congress breaking into offices. A noose was hung from scaffolding and the mob was chanting ‘Hang Mike Pence’. They were searching to capture the Speaker of the House. They were armed with collapsible weapons, stun guns, bear spray and zip tie handcuffs. It is unclear what outcome they were seeking: the violent overthrow of our Constitutional government and the installation of their Glorious Leader… President for life?
Trump lost
the election. He lost the popular vote
by almost eight million. Every Governor
and Secretary of State in all the contested states certified the election
counts as fair, accurate and unassailable.
There were numerous recounts, each affirming the results of President Biden’s
win. Sixty-four judges, many Republican
judges that were appointed by Trump, threw out Trump’s lawsuits as having no
merit. Trump’s total argument was that thousands
showed up at his rallies so he couldn’t have lost the election; and even now he
continues the Big Lie.
The major
threat to United States of America is no longer foreign terrorist, but
radicalized American terrorist motivated by the ex-President of the United
States – Donald J. Trump.
the Ol’Buzzard
Yesterday I
read the BLOGFODDRE post Remembering the Farm: Water, Wells and Dugouts. He wrote of the difficulty of obtaining
water on his family’s farm in Saskatchewan, Canada.
His post
brought to mind my memories of water in the small delta town of Rolling Fork,
Mississippi during the 1950’s. I was
always told that Rolling Fork got its water from an artesian well – I know
absolutely nothing of the source. I do
remember when I took a bath, the water in the tub was piss yellow. There was a swimming pool in town and the pool
water looked like tea. The deep end of
the pool was eight feet and the water was so dark you could not see the bottom at
that depth. We drank that water and
never thought anything about it.
Of course,
the world population in 1950 is estimated at 2.5 billion, now we are approaching
a world population of eight billion. Water consumption, water waste and water
pollution are exponentially greater than the mid twentieth century.
If anyone
had considered selling a bottle of water back then, they would have been
laughed at. Water was free: it came from
the sky, and rivers and lakes were full of it, you could dig a well and hit
water.
That was
then, this is now. Water is now a critical
commodity. Cities have been built in the
deserts, people water their lawns, mega-farms irrigate crops; costal marshes
have been decimated, rivers are running low, lakes are drying up. Humans have squandered water sources
thinking the supply unlimited.
California
is now in the process of converting sewer water into drinking water. There are many areas in the United States
where water conservation is a pressing issue, and repurposing sewerage may
become an accepted solution.
Climate
change will acerbate this problem, and it is quite feasible that in the not-too-distant
future wars could be fought over water sources.
the Ol’Buzzard
The news,
and the government, throw around the numbers billion and trillion as if they are
talking about the cost of a new car: a two-trillion-dollar tax cut, a three
trillion-dollar infrastructure plan, a two trillion-dollar covid relief
package.
Compared to
this, the world population of seven-billion doesn’t sound like so much. And a million is chump chance to many people;
the Jaguar C-X75 automobile cost $1.1 million.
Let’s put
this in perspective:
If you took
a stick and banged it on your kitchen table once-per-second, twenty-four hours
a day non-stop; it would take you twelve days to bang out a million.
Banging out
a billion would take you thirty-two years, and to bang out the population of
the earth (seven-billion) would take two-hundred and twenty-four years.)
It would
take thirty-two thousand years (32,000) to bang out one trillion, and that very
likely exceeds way past the sell-by date our earth.
the Ol’Buzzard
Maine is a
huge state with most of its population along the coast, supported by the tourist
industry. However, rural Maine stayed
tied to a rustic life-style throughout most of the 20th century,
with logging and farming being the main sources of employment. In
the 1980 my wife and I lived in a house with no plumbing or electricity. We read by lamp light, listened to Maine Public
Radio on a battery radio, and carried our water from a nearby stream. Our lifestyle was not unusual.
Because of
deep ties to the past, Maine has a rich supernatural history of ghost, goblins
and vampires; and since two-thirds of the state is unpopulated there are also
many tales of strange animal sightings. Over
the last twenty years there have been accounts of an animal that attacks and
kill small pets, including dogs. Those
wishing to add drama to the accounts are claiming the animal is the Chupacabra:
the mythical monster of Mexico.
PBS is
available for download on smart TV’s and include the series Monstrum, hosted Dr Emily Zarka. If you like the macabre this series is worth
watching, and Public Broadcasting is always worth supporting.
After all, this is the home of Stephen King
the Ol'Buzzard
It has been ages since I posted a Playing For Change video. This one features Dr. John.
the Ol'Buzzard
Along with
other oddities of growing old, insomnia seems to be common. I don’t have any trouble falling asleep,
but I wake about four each morning with the monkeys run through my mind
dragging random thoughts that seem to keep me awake.
We view
ourselves today as fait accompli, the final, perfect product in the tree
of evolution.
There is
some justification for that thinking, since evolutionary differences have resulted
from adaptive changes among isolated groups to specific environments: Aboriginal
in Australia differ from pigmies in Africa and differ from Nordic populations
in northern Europe…
Today, with the
ease of world travel people are less isolated resulting in more cross-cultural societies.
It seems
likely to me that the next evolution of humankind will not happen in isolated
societies, but as the result of the ease of global travel, we will experience assimilation
– moving toward a homogeneous race.
Cultural accommodation
has more effect on our actions than logic and biological adaptation, so it will
take the dying off of most generations living today to asphyxiate the idea of
racial purity.
In our egocentricity,
we view time over the period of our lifespan, but time is a continuum. As important as we think we are, humankind
will evolve over time, just as we always have – unless we bring about our own
destruction.
the Ol’Buzzard