President Obama recently
spoke about weaning the country off of fossil fuel dependency from foreign
countries. Liberals, me included, seem
to get all misty eyed when we talk about electrical power from wind mills, tide
and solar.
There is a basic flaw in my
character, however, that always has to take things one step further – beyond
the ideal – and look at the practical.
My first thought was that for
the cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars (one trillion when you add in
all the peripheral spending) the government could have outfitted every home in America with
wind and solar power.
Using numbers from Understanding the Market web site, there are 316,000,000 (three hundred and sixteen million) people in
the United States
and approximately 125,000,000 (one hundred twenty five million) private
homes. This works out to about $8,000
per private home that could have been applied to home energy production.
Outfitting every home with
solar and wind power would cut the national electrical consumption at least by
one third. This means that the country
would have to produce and supply less power, consequently using less fossil
fuel.
Aah, there is the rub.
If we drastically cut our
electrical consumption, thus our fossil fuel consumption, massive layoffs would
occur. Companies that produce, transfer
and refine the oil products would experience layoffs; likewise companies that
manufacture and support the fossil fuel companies would slow down; there would
be less need for tanker truck and fuel transporting trains; power companies
would have to downsize and power grids would shrink. Many sectors of our economy would experience
lay offs and down sizing. The unemployment would skyrocket and the economy crash.
There might possibly be a
temporary construction boom in the production and installation of alternative
energy equipment, but once it was on line that sector would decline.
Another scenario: instead of
channeling the money to individual homes the government could have channeled
the money to power and energy companies to produce more alternative energy for
the grid…what could possibly go wrong there?
But this is all conjecture –
what if… The reality is that when given
the choice of prosperity for the people or war: the government politicians will
choose war every time.
Government likes the status quo. It works for the rich - and what's good for Colonel Bullmoose is good for the USA.
the Ol'Buzzard
It wouldn't be quite as drastic as your scenario. Very few home alternative energy systems would supply all of the home's needs. What would happen is there would be less need to build new powerplants and less need to upgrade the grid. I think the transition would almost balance out in the terms of jobs gained and lost. Especially as it wouldn't happen overnight. Kinda like when the country went from horses to cars and trucks.
ReplyDeleteObviously and extreme scenario. But, what the hell, thought I would approach it from a Republican point of view. Sux doesn't it?
ReplyDeleteO'B
Yup.
Delete