Showing posts with label Militia sedition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Militia sedition. Show all posts

Saturday, October 8, 2016

ONE MORE TAKE ON SENSIBLE GUN CONTROL






The argument that the Second Amendment was to allow citizens to have guns to protect themselves against their own government is blatantly false.  
I know this bothers some gun supporters that have heard this from the NRA and used this as their argument for no gun laws.  But, in 1791 when the Amendment was past, America did not have a standing army and the intent was to guarantee citizens could own guns so in time of crisis a militia could be quickly raised – not armed for an insurrection against the government.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

In 1792 the Congress went one step further, passing an act requiring all male citizens to arm themselves in order to be able to quickly raise a militia:

Each and every free able-bodied white male citizen of the respective States, resident therein, who is or shall be of age of eighteen years, and under the age of forty-five years (except as is herein after excepted) shall severally and respectively be enrolled in the militia… every citizen so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, provide himself with a good musket or flrelock, and sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch with a box therein to contain not less than twenty-four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of powder and ball: or with a good rifle, knapsack ,shot-pouch and powder-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a pound of powder; and shall appear, so armed, accoutered and provided, when called out to exercise, or into service, except, that when called out on company days to exercise only, he may appear without a knapsack.

Today we have a standing army and the requirement for all citizens to arm is not necessary – neither is the argument that we must arm ourselves so we can overthrow our own government.  

We fought a Civil War against the idea of anarchy – the point should be well established. 



The need to line up at Burger King with assault rifles and pistols defies common sense and places the general public in danger.


The Ol’Buzzard

Friday, January 29, 2016

OREGON MILITIA NOT SO TOUGH.



About time the law quit playing games with the militia morons in Oregon.   If they had been black and taken over a federal building  they would have all been dead or arrested on the second day. 

The FBI and other law enforcement agencies have often been seen as too quick to use deadly force; however, in this case LaVoy Finicum had bragged on tape that he wouldn't be taken without fighting back.    He had the choicer of surrendering peacefully, but instead nearly hit an officer with his vehicle and then presented himself as a threat to the officers.   

Enough with this bullshit.   These grown men playing military have gotten away with sedition for too long, and have been encouraged to bolder actions by the lack of swift accountability to the law. 

I 'played Army' when I was twelve years old; but I out grew it.   I spent 22 years in the military.  If these flakes want to dress in camouflage and carry assault weapons - there is a place for them in the Middle East where they can actually serve and protect the Constitution and the United States. 

Fuck these retards.
the Ol'Buzzard